Posted by : Irvin Jackson
Thousands of Uber sexual assault lawsuits filed in federal courts nationwide in the coming months, leading to a motion to centralize all claims against the ride-share company before one U.S. District Judge
A panel of federal judges has agreed to hear oral arguments next month over whether all Uber sexual assault lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide should be consolidated before one judge, for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.
There are currently at least 22 Uber assault lawsuits pending against the rideshare company in 11 different judicial districts, each making similar allegations that plaintiffs were sexually assaulted by Uber drivers. The complaints claim Uber has failed to take appropriate safety precautions that could have prevented sexual predators from targeting Uber passengers on a regular basis.
Although Uber implemented Safe Ride Fees in 2014, the lawsuits indicate that the company never used that money to actually make its passengers safer, providing only cursory background checks for drivers. The company also failed to provide surveillance cameras inside cars, did not allow passengers to make requests regarding the gender of drivers, and failed to train drivers on issues of sexual assault and harassment.
Sexual Assault Lawsuits
Last month, a group of plaintiffs filed a motion with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), asking it to consolidate all Uber assault lawsuits before one federal judge for pretrial proceedings in the Northern District of California.
The motion indicates there may eventually be thousands of lawsuits filed by rideshare passengers who were also sexually assaulted or harassed, each raising common questions of fact and law against Uber.
The plaintiffs argue consolidation is necessary to reduce duplicative discovery into common issues, avoid conflicting pretrial rulings from different courts and promote judicial efficiencies.
Uber has not yet responded to the motion or provided its stance on whether the claims should be centralized, but is expected to file a brief by August 18, 2023.
On August 11, the JPML issued a Notice of Hearing Session (PDF), announcing that the panel will hear oral arguments over whether the cases should be consolidated, and if so, where. The hearing is scheduled for September 28 at the University of Kentucky J. David Rosenberg College of Law, in Lexington, Kentucky.
If an MDL is established, each individual claim would be transferred to one U.S. District Judge for pretrial proceedings and a series of bellwether trials designed to help the parties gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the litigation. However, if Uber assault settlements are not reached to resolve large numbers of claims, each individual lawsuit may later be returned back to the U.S. District Court where it was originally filed for trial.
The post Uber Assault Lawsuit Consolidation to Be Considered By JPML in Late September appeared first on AboutLawsuits.com.
- Sudafed Faces Legal Battle: Lawsuit Filed Over Alleged Side Effects
- Research Reveals Connection Between Bacteria In Artificial Tears Eye Drops And Corneal Ulcer, Scarring
- Consumers Seek Justice: Sudafed Faces Class Action Lawsuit For Ineffective Cold Medications
- Camp Lejeune Elective Option Pros and Cons
- Camp Lejeune
- Client Acquistion
- Client Financing
- Company Business
- Daily Dose of Law
- Digital Display Advertising
- Google Maps Ranking
- Human Trafficking
- Law Firm Info
- Lead Generation
- Litigation Funding
- Mass Tort News
- Mass Tort Signed Cases
- Personal Injury Leads
- Sex Abuse Cases